How the Constitutional Court can Undo Constitutional Damage by Referring to the Constitution and Laws and Regulations

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's decision as a remedy for constitutional losses does not necessarily lead to the restoration of constitutional rights. Therefore, even though the Constitutional Court had decided, there were also petitioners who still considered the losses suffered by the Constitutional Court not yet recovered. This happens because one of the powers that the Constitutional Court has is the review of the Law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, where this authority is different from the authority of constitutional complaint which provides restoration of constitutional rights to those concerned only.